ACSC '11 Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Australasian Computer Science Conference - Volume 113
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Despite recent interests in developing vertical handoff decision algorithms, an essential component of the architecture of the next generation heterogeneous wireless networks, very few studies have so far reported any meaningful comparative performance analysis. This paper attempts to fill this gap in the literature by presenting a comprehensive study on the performance of three vertical handoff decision algorithms, namely, SAW (Simple Additive Weighting), TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), and MDP (Markov Decision Process). We have used both analytical and simulation tools (ns-2.29) to evaluate and compare expected total QoS offerings in the mean duration of a service under different state transition probability distributions, user perception models on the importance of QoS parameters, and network switching costs. To our surprise, we have observed TOPSIS achieving the best performance despite MDP’s using the optimal policy. We suspect that the user satisfiability model used in MDP to estimate link rewards might have contradicted the underlying user perception model used to estimate normalised weight of each QoS parameter, which will be investigated in future.