Characterising the robustness of complex networks

  • Authors:
  • A. Sydney;C. Scoglio;M. Youssef;P. Schumm

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kansas State University, Rathbone Hall, Manhattan, Kansas 66506-5204, USA.;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kansas State University, Rathbone Hall, Manhattan, Kansas 66506-5204, USA.;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kansas State University, Rathbone Hall, Manhattan, Kansas 66506-5204, USA.;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kansas State University, Rathbone Hall, Manhattan, Kansas 66506-5204, USA

  • Venue:
  • International Journal of Internet Technology and Secured Transactions
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

With increasingly ambitious initiatives such as GENI and FIND that seek to design future internets, it becomes imperative to define the characteristics of robust topologies, and build future networks optimised for robustness. This paper investigates the characteristics of network topologies that maintain a high level of throughput in spite of multiple attacks. To this end, we select network topologies belonging to the main network models and some real world networks. We consider three types of attacks: removal of random nodes, high degree nodes, and high betweenness nodes. We use elasticity as our robustness measure and, through our analysis, illustrate different topologies that can have different degrees of robustness. In particular, elasticity can fall as low as 0.8% of the upper bound based on the attack employed. This result substantiates the need for optimised network topology design. Furthermore, we implement a trade-off function that combines elasticity under the three attack strategies and considers the cost of the network. Our extensive simulations show that, for a given network density, regular and semi-regular topologies can have higher degrees of robustness than heterogeneous topologies, and that link redundancy is a sufficient but not necessary condition for robustness.