Liability issues in software engineering: the use of formal methods to reduce legal uncertainties

  • Authors:
  • Daniel Le Métayer;Manuel Maarek;Eduardo Mazza;Marie-Laure Potet;Stéphane Frénot;Valérie Viet Triem Tong;Nicolas Craipeau;Ronan Hardouin

  • Affiliations:
  • INRIA, Grenoble Rhône-Alpes, France;INRIA, Grenoble Rhône-Alpes, France;University of Grenoble, France;University of Grenoble, France;INRIA, Grenoble Rhône-Alpes, and INSA, Lyon, France;SSIR, Supélec Rennes, France;University of Caen, France;University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin, France

  • Venue:
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 48.23

Visualization

Abstract

This paper reports on the results of a multidisciplinary project involving lawyers and computer scientists with the aim to put forward a set of methods and tools to (1) define software liability in a precise and unambiguous way and (2) establish such liability in case of incident. The overall approach taken in the project is presented through an electronic signature case study. The case study illustrates a situation where, in order to reduce legal uncertainties, the parties wish to include in the contract specific clauses to define as precisely as possible the share of liabilities between them for the main types of failures of the system.