The dynamic architecture maturity matrix: instrument analysis and refinement

Authors:
Marlies van Steenbergen;Jurjen Schipper;Rik Bos;Sjaak Brinkkemper
Affiliations:
Sogeti Netherlands, Diemen, The Netherlands;Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Venue:
ICSOC/ServiceWave'09 Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on Service-oriented computing
Year:
2009

Citing 6
Cited 2

A foundation for the study of group decision support systems

Management Science
Test process improvement: a practical step-by-step guide to structured testing

Test process improvement: a practical step-by-step guide to structured testing
Business architecture: A new paradigm to relate business strategy to ICT

Information Systems Frontiers
Building an Enterprise Architecture Practice: Tools, Tips, Best Practices, Ready-to-Use Insights (The Enterprise Series)

Building an Enterprise Architecture Practice: Tools, Tips, Best Practices, Ready-to-Use Insights (The Enterprise Series)
Experience Report: Assessing a Global Financial Services Company on its Enterprise Architecture Effectiveness Using NAOMI

HICSS '07 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication, and Analysis

Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication, and Analysis

The design of focus area maturity models

DESRIST'10 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Global Perspectives on Design Science Research
Improving software product management: a knowledge management approach

International Journal of Business Information Systems

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The field of enterprise architecture is still very much in development. Many architecture teams are looking to improve their effectiveness. One of the instruments to do so is the Dynamic Architecture Maturity Matrix. In the past the DyAMM has been applied to many architecture practices to assess their architecture maturity level. In this paper we present an analysis of these assessments. This provides us with an overview of common strengths and weaknesses in existing architecture practices. In addition, we use the set of assessments to analyze the DyAMM instrument for four types of anomalies.