Nonlocal patch-based label fusion for hippocampus segmentation

  • Authors:
  • Pierrick Coupé;José V. Manjón;Vladimir Fonov;Jens Pruessner;Montserrat Robles;D. Louis Collins

  • Affiliations:
  • McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada;Instituto de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologías de la Información y de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain;McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada;McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada;Instituto de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologías de la Información y de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain;McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

  • Venue:
  • MICCAI'10 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention: Part III
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Quantitative magnetic resonance analysis often requires accurate, robust and reliable automatic extraction of anatomical structures. Recently, template-warping methods incorporating a label fusion strategy have demonstrated high accuracy in segmenting cerebral structures. In this study, we propose a novel patch-based method using expert segmentation priors to achieve this task. Inspired by recent work in image denoising, the proposed nonlocal patch-based label fusion produces accurate and robust segmentation. During our experiments, the hippocampi of 80 healthy subjects were segmented. The influence on segmentation accuracy of different parameters such as patch size or number of training subjects was also studied. Moreover, a comparison with an appearance-based method and a template-based method was carried out. The highest median kappa value obtained with the proposed method was 0.884, which is competitive compared with recently published methods.