PA1 and IND-CCA2 do not guarantee PA2: brief examples

  • Authors:
  • Yamin Liu;Bao Li;Xianhui Lu;Yazhe Zhang

  • Affiliations:
  • State Key Laboratory of Information Security, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;State Key Laboratory of Information Security, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;State Key Laboratory of Information Security, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;State Key Laboratory of Information Security, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Venue:
  • IWSEC'10 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Advances in information and computer security
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We give several examples to show that PA1 and IND-CCA2 together do not guarantee PA2 in the absence of random oracles, for both statistical and computational PA. In the statistical case, we use the Desmedt-Phan hybrid encryption scheme as the first example. If the DEM of the Desmedt-Phan hybrid encryption is an IND-CCA2 symmetric encryption without MAC, then the Desmedt-Phan hybrid is IND-CCA2 and statistical PA1 but not statistical PA2. Extend the result to the Cramer-Shoup hybrid encryption scheme, we find that even statistical PA1+ and IND-CCA2 together could not reach statistical PA2. In the computational case, we give an artificial example to show that neither statistical nor computational PA1 together with IND-CCA2 could guarantee computational PA2.