Assessing the robustness of complete bacterial genome segmentations

  • Authors:
  • Hugo Devillers;Hélène Chiapello;Sophie Schbath;Meriem El Karoui

  • Affiliations:
  • INRA, Mathématique, Informatique et Génome, Jouy-en-Josas, France;INRA, Mathématique, Informatique et Génome, Jouy-en-Josas, France;INRA, Mathématique, Informatique et Génome, Jouy-en-Josas, France;INRA, Unité Bactéries Lactiques et Pathogènes Opportunistes, Jouy-en-Josas, France

  • Venue:
  • RECOMB-CG'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Comparative genomics
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Comparison of closely related bacterial genomes has revealed the presence of highly conserved sequences forming a "backbone" that is interrupted by numerous, less conserved, DNA fragments. Segmentation of bacterial genomes into backbone and variable regions is particularly useful to investigate bacterial genome evolution. Several software tools have been designed to compare complete bacterial chromosomes and a few online databases store pre-computed genome comparisons. However, very few statistical methods are available to evaluate the reliability of these software tools and to compare the results obtained with them. To fill this gap, we have developed two local scores to measure the robustness of bacterial genome segmentations. Our method uses a simulation procedure based on random perturbations of the compared genomes. The scores presented in this paper are simple to implement and our results show that they allow to discriminate easily between robust and non-robust bacterial genome segmentations when using aligners such as MAUVE and MGA.