The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
WordNet: a lexical database for English
Communications of the ACM
SIGDOC '86 Proceedings of the 5th annual international conference on Systems documentation
A logic for uncertain probabilities
International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems
Identifying topics by position
ANLC '97 Proceedings of the fifth conference on Applied natural language processing
Using syntactic dependency as local context to resolve word sense ambiguity
ACL '98 Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Eighth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Automatic evaluation of summaries using N-gram co-occurrence statistics
NAACL '03 Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology - Volume 1
The Evaluation of Sentence Similarity Measures
DaWaK '08 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery
Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy
IJCAI'95 Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
An enhanced framework of subjective logic for semantic document analysis
MDAI'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Modeling decisions for artificial intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, an extension of Subjective Logic (SL) is presented which uses semantic information from a document to find 'opinions' about a sentence. This method computes semantic overlap of events (words or sentences) using Hierarchical Document Signature (HDS) and uses it as evidence to formulate SL belief measures to order sentences according to their importance. Stronger the opinion, more is the significance. These significant sentences then form extractive summaries of the document. The experimental results show that summaries generated by this method are more similar to human generated ones have outperformed the baseline summaries on average over all the data sets considered.