Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems
Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
SIAM Journal on Computing
On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing
SODA '05 Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Combination can be hard: approximability of the unique coverage problem
SODA '06 Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm
Buying cheap is expensive: hardness of non-parametric multi-product pricing
SODA '07 Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Item pricing for revenue maximization
Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce
Uniform Budgets and the Envy-Free Pricing Problem
ICALP '08 Proceedings of the 35th international colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Part I
On Stackelberg Pricing with Computationally Bounded Consumers
WINE '09 Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics
The Stackelberg Minimum Spanning Tree Game on Planar and Bounded-Treewidth Graphs
WINE '09 Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics
The stackelberg minimum spanning tree game
WADS'07 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Algorithms and Data Structures
The Stackelberg minimum spanning tree game on planar and bounded-treewidth graphs
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We consider the Stackelberg shortest-path pricing problem, which is defined as follows. Given a graph G with fixed-cost and pricable edges and two distinct vertices s and t, we may assign prices to the pricable edges. Based on the predefined fixed costs and our prices, a customer purchases a cheapest s-t-path in G and we receive payment equal to the sum of prices of pricable edges belonging to the path. Our goal is to find prices maximizing the payment received from the customer. While Stackelberg shortest-path pricing was known to be APX-hard before, we provide the first explicit approximation threshold and prove hardness of approximation within 2-o(1). We also argue that the nicely structured type of instance resulting from our reduction captures most of the challenges we face in dealing with the problem in general and, in particular, we show that the gap between the revenue of an optimal pricing and the only known general upper bound can still be logarithmically large.