Computation in networks of passively mobile finite-state sensors
Distributed Computing - Special issue: PODC 04
Making Population Protocols Self-stabilizing
SSS '09 Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems
On utilizing speed in networks of mobile agents
Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing
Self-stabilizing leader election in networks of finite-state anonymous agents
OPODIS'06 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Principles of Distributed Systems
Self-stabilizing population protocols
OPODIS'05 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Principles of Distributed Systems
Space complexity of self-stabilizing leader election in passively-mobile anonymous agents
SIROCCO'09 Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Structural Information and Communication Complexity
Loosely-Stabilizing leader election in population protocol model
SIROCCO'09 Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Structural Information and Communication Complexity
Self-stabilizing counting in mobile sensor networks with a base station
DISC'07 Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Distributed Computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We consider a problem on a passively-mobile sensor network with a base station; the base station counts the number of sensors in the network. In [6], these passively-mobile sensor networks are modeled by extending the model of population protocols and self-stabilizing protocols to count the number of existing sensors, where self-stabilizing counting means from any initial states of sensors and some initialization of the base station (unless the base station is initialized, this problem can not be solved in general), the base station eventually counts the exact number of sensors in the system. In this setting, Beauquier et al.[6] show several protocols to solve the self-stabilizing counting (See Table 1). In this paper, we focus on space complexity of the self-stabilizing counting protocols (that is, the number of states sensors can possess, denoted by α(P), where P is an upper bound of the number of states) and improve it by showing selfstabilizing counting protocols using α(P) = 2P and α(P) = 3P/2, respectively. Since previous best known protocol needs α(P) = 4P and a lower bound of α(P) is P, we can shrink the gap lying that feasibility.