Retail Assortment Planning Under Category Captainship

Authors:
Mümin Kurtuluş;Alper Nakkas
Affiliations:
Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203;Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203
Venue:
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Year:
2011

Citing 7
Cited 1

Product assortment in a triopolgy

Management Science
On the Relationship Between Inventory Costs and Variety Benefits in Retailassortments

Management Science
The Variety of An Assortment

Marketing Science
Retail Assortment Planning in the Presence of Consumer Search

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Category Management and Coordination in Retail Assortment Planning in the Presence of Basket Shopping Consumers

Management Science
On the Effects of Consumer Search and Firm Entry in a Multiproduct Competitive Market

Marketing Science
Competitive Consequences of Using a Category Captain

Management Science

Optimal and Competitive Assortments with Endogenous Pricing Under Hierarchical Consumer Choice Models

Management Science

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Retail assortment planning can have a tremendous impact on a retailer's bottom-line performance. Over the past years, retailers have increasingly relied on their leading manufacturers for recommendations regarding the assortment to be offered to the consumers in a particular category, a practice often referred to as category captainship. Our research investigates the consequences of using category captains for assortment selection decisions. We develop a game-theoretic model where multiple manufacturers sell their products to consumers through a single retailer. We compare a model where the retailer selects the assortment in the category with a model where the retailer relies on a category captain for assortment decisions in return for a target category profit. We show that category captainship can, in some circumstances, benefit not only the retailer and the category captain, but also the noncaptain manufacturers. Our results have implications regarding the implementation of category captainship practices.