Perspectives on the theory and practice of belief functions
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Rejoinders to comments on “Perspectives on the theory and practice of belief functions”
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning - Special issue: The belief functions revisited: questions and answers
Artificial Intelligence
Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
Upper and Lower Entropies of Belief Functions Using Compatible Probability Functions
ISMIS '93 Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems
Creating Prototypes for Fast Classification in Dempster-Shafer Clustering
ECSQARU/FAPR '97 Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Qualitative and Quantitative Practical Reasoning
Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions
Information Fusion
Clustering decomposed belief functions using generalized weights of conflict
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Towards an alarm for opposition conflict in a conjunctive combination of belief functions
ECSQARU'11 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty
Singular sources mining using evidential conflict analysis
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Constructing and evaluating alternative frames of discernment
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Selecting source behavior in information fusion on the basis of consistency and specificity
ECSQARU'13 Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
How to preserve the conflict as an alarm in the combination of belief functions?
Decision Support Systems
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this article we develop a method for conflict management within Dempster-Shafer theory. The idea is that each piece of evidence is discounted in proportion to the degree that it contributes to the conflict. This way the contributors of conflict are managed on a case-by-case basis in relation to the problem they cause. Discounting is performed in a sequence of incremental steps, with conflict updated at each step, until the overall conflict is brought down exactly to a predefined acceptable level.