Pros and cons of route optimization schemes for network mobility (NEMO) and their effects on handovers

Authors:
Muhammad Qasim Khan;Steinar Hidle Andresen;Kashif Nizam Khan
Affiliations:
NTNU, Trondheim Norway;NTNU, Trondheim Norway;NTNU, Trondheim Norway
Venue:
Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology
Year:
2010

Citing 5
Cited 0

VARON: Vehicular Ad hoc Route Optimisation for NEMO

Computer Communications
Multihoming in Nested Mobile Networks with Route Optimization

SAINT-W '07 Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops
Simultaneous usage of NEMO and MANET for vehicular communication

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Testbeds and research infrastructures for the development of networks & communities
Route Optimization in Nested NEMO: Classification, Evaluation, and Analysis from NEMO Fringe Stub Perspective

IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
Evaluation of prefix delegation-based route optimization schemes for NEMO

ICC'09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on Communications

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

No one can deny the importance of mobility in modern communication networks and Internet is no exception. IETF has introduced the Network Mobility (NEMO) protocol to support a moving network. NEMO solves many problems of Mobile IP (MIP) to support a moving group of users, but introduces some problems of its own like suboptimal routing and multiple levels of encapsulation. These problems occur because the NEMO basic support protocol (NEMO BSP) does not support route optimization and because of nested mobile networks. Many solutions have been proposed in the literature to solve these problems. In this article we present a comprehensive survey of those solutions and will discuss their advantages and disadvantages. We also outline the effect of these solutions on handovers and a summary is provided in the form of a table at the end.