Building a large annotated corpus of English: the penn treebank
Computational Linguistics - Special issue on using large corpora: II
An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations
ACL '02 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
Using automatically labelled examples to classify rhetorical relations: An assessment
Natural Language Engineering
NAACL-Short '06 Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume: Short Papers
Automatic sense prediction for implicit discourse relations in text
ACL '09 Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 2 - Volume 2
Recognizing implicit discourse relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank
EMNLP '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 1 - Volume 1
Semi-supervised discourse relation classification with structural learning
CICLing'11 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing - Volume Part I
Improving implicit discourse relation recognition through feature set optimization
SIGDIAL '12 Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We report results on predicting the sense of implicit discourse relations between adjacent sentences in text. Our investigation concentrates on the association between discourse relations and properties of the referring expressions that appear in the related sentences. The properties of interest include coreference information, grammatical role, information status and syntactic form of referring expressions. Predicting the sense of implicit discourse relations based on these features is considerably better than a random baseline and several of the most discriminative features conform with linguistic intuitions. However, these features do not perform as well as lexical features traditionally used for sense prediction.