Discovery of inference rules for question-answering
Natural Language Engineering
EMNLP '03 Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing
Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis
HLT '05 Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Multi-perspective question answering using the OpQA corpus
HLT '05 Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Comparative experiments on sentiment classification for online product reviews
AAAI'06 proceedings of the 21st national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
Opinion and generic question answering systems: a performance analysis
ACLShort '09 Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers
A pilot study of opinion summarization in conversations
HLT '11 Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Volume 1
CONSENTO: a new framework for opinion based entity search and summarization
Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The treatment of factual data has been widely studied in different areas of Natural Language Processing (NLP). However, processing subjective information still poses important challenges. This paper presents research aimed at assessing techniques that have been suggested as appropriate in the context of subjective - Opinion Question Answering (OQA). We evaluate the performance of an OQA with these new components and propose methods to optimally tackle the issues encountered. We assess the impact of including additional resources and processes with the purpose of improving the system performance on two distinct blog datasets. The improvements obtained for the different combination of tools are statistically significant. We thus conclude that the proposed approach is adequate for the OQA task, offering a good strategy to deal with opinionated questions.