Depth-first iterative-deepening: an optimal admissible tree search
Artificial Intelligence
Improving opening book performance through modeling of chess opponents
CSC '96 Proceedings of the 1996 ACM 24th annual conference on Computer science
Combining online and offline knowledge in UCT
Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning
EvoWorkshops '09 Proceedings of the EvoWorkshops 2009 on Applications of Evolutionary Computing: EvoCOMNET, EvoENVIRONMENT, EvoFIN, EvoGAMES, EvoHOT, EvoIASP, EvoINTERACTION, EvoMUSART, EvoNUM, EvoSTOC, EvoTRANSLOG
Optimizing fixed-size stochastic controllers for POMDPs and decentralized POMDPs
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Consistency modifications for automatically tuned Monte-Carlo tree search
LION'10 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Learning and intelligent optimization
Innovative opening-book handling
ACG'05 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Advances in Computer Games
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In the past we used a great deal of computational power and human expertise for storing a rather big dataset of good 9×9 Go games, in order to build an opening book. We improved the algorithm used for generating and storing these games considerably. However, the results were not very robust, as (i) opening books are definitely not transitive, making the non-regression testing extremely difficult, (ii) different time settings lead to opposite conclusions, because a good opening for a game with 10s per move on a single core is quite different from a good opening for a game with 30s per move on a 32-cores machine, and (iii) some very bad moves sometimes still occur. In this paper, we formalize the optimization of an opening book as a matrix game, compute the Nash equilibrium, and conclude that a naturally randomized opening book provides optimal performance (in the sense of Nash equilibria). Moreover, our research showed that from a finite set of opening books, we can choose a distribution on these opening books so that the resultant randomly constructed opening book has a significantly better performance than each of the deterministic opening books.