On-line scheduling in the presence of overload
SFCS '91 Proceedings of the 32nd annual symposium on Foundations of computer science
On the competitiveness of on-line real-time task scheduling
Real-Time Systems
Scheduling Parallel Machines On-line
SIAM Journal on Computing
Online computation and competitive analysis
Online computation and competitive analysis
SODA '94 Proceedings of the fifth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Online scheduling with hard deadlines
Journal of Algorithms
Scheduling with job release dates, delivery times and preemption penalties
Information Processing Letters
Online deadline scheduling: multiple machines and randomization
Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures
Minimizing Total Completion Time Subject to Job Release Dates and Preemption Penalties
Journal of Scheduling
Patience is a virtue: the effect of slack on competitiveness for admission control
Journal of Scheduling - Special issue: On-line algorithm part I
A near optimal scheduler for on-demand data broadcasts
Theoretical Computer Science
Lower bounds on online deadline scheduling with preemption penalties
Information Processing Letters
Scheduling broadcasts with deadlines
COCOON'03 Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Computing and combinatorics
Laxity helps in broadcast scheduling
ICTCS'05 Proceedings of the 9th Italian conference on Theoretical Computer Science
Improved on-line broadcast scheduling with deadlines
COCOON'06 Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on Computing and Combinatorics
On-line scheduling on a single machine: maximizing the number of early jobs
Operations Research Letters
Online traveling salesman problem with deadline and advanced information
Computers and Industrial Engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents a study of the problem of online deadline scheduling under the preemption penalty model of Zheng, Xu, and Zhang (2007). In that model, each preemption incurs a penalty of @r times the weight of the preempted job, where @r=0 is the preemption penalty parameter. The objective is to maximise the total weight of jobs completed on time minus the total penalty. When the scheduler knows the ratio of longest to shortest job length, @D, we show that the WAL algorithm of Zheng et al. (2007) is ((1+@r)@D+o(@D))-competitive for sufficiently large @D. This improves the bound shown in Zheng et al. (2007). When the scheduler only knows that @D=(k(1+@r))^3 for some k1, we propose a ((k(1+@r)@D/(k-1))+o(@D))-competitive algorithm. When @r=0, we give an optimal, O(@D/log @D)-competitive algorithm that, unlike previous algorithms, does not require knowledge of @D. This settles an open problem mentioned in Ting (2008).