Empirical study of journal impact factors obtained using the classical two-year citation window versus a five-year citation window

Authors:
Juan Miguel Campanario
Affiliations:
Departamento de Física, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
Venue:
Scientometrics
Year:
2011

Citing 3
Cited 2

Measuring the quality of publications: new methodology and case study

Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
The publication and citation impact profiles of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts: A case study on the limitations of the Journal Impact Factor

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Garfield and the impact factor

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Shaping the landscape of research in information systems from the perspective of editorial boards: A scientometric study of 77 leading journals

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Some citation-related characteristics of scientific journals published in individual countries

Scientometrics

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this article I study characteristics of the journal impact factor (JIF) computed using a 5-year citation window as compared with the classical JIF computed using a 2-year citation window. Since 2007 ISI-Thomson Reuters has published the new 5-year impact factor in the JCR database. I studied changes in the distribution of JIFs when the citation window was enlarged. The distributions of journals according their 5-year JIFs were very similar all years studied, and were also similar to the distribution according to the 2-year JIFs. In about 72% of journals, the JIF increased when the longer citation window was used. Plots of 5-year JIFs against rank closely followed a beta function with two exponents. Thus, the 5-year JIF seems to behave very similarly to the 2-year JIF. The results also suggest that gains in JIF with the longer citation window tend to distribute similarly in all years. Changes in these gains also tend to distribute similarly from 1 year to the following year.