$${\in_K}$$: a Non-Fregean Logic of Explicit Knowledge

• Authors: Steffen Lewitzka
• Venue: Studia Logica
• Year: 2011

We present a new logic-based approach to the reasoning about knowledge which is independent of possible worlds semantics. $${\in_K}$$ (Epsilon-K) is a non-Fregean logic whose models consist of propositional universes with subsets for true, false and known propositions. Knowledge is, in general, not closed under rules of inference; the only valid epistemic principles are the knowledge axiom K i 驴 驴 驴 and some minimal conditions concerning common knowledge in a group. Knowledge is explicit and all forms of the logical omniscience problem are avoided. Various stronger epistemic properties such as positive and/or negative introspection, the K-axiom, closure under logical connectives, etc. can be restored by imposing additional semantic constraints. This yields corresponding sublogics for which we present sound and complete axiomatizations. As a useful tool for general model constructions we study abstract versions of some 3-valued logics in which we interpret truth as knowledge. We establish a connection between $${\in_K}$$ and the well-known syntactic approach to explicit knowledge proving a result concerning equi-expressiveness. Furthermore, we discuss some self-referential epistemic statements, such as the knower paradox, as relaxations of variants of the liar paradox and show how these epistemic "paradoxes" can be solved in $${\in_K}$$ . Every specific $${\in_K}$$ -logic is defined as a certain extension of some underlying classical abstract logic.