Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network
Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks
Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Efficient influence maximization in social networks
Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks
Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Scalable Influence Maximization in Social Networks under the Linear Threshold Model
ICDM '10 Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
Tractable models for information diffusion in social networks
PKDD'06 Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Principle and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases
Making your interests follow you on twitter
Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
Influence spread in large-scale social networks --- a belief propagation approach
ECML PKDD'12 Proceedings of the 2012 European conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases - Volume Part II
Information propagation in microblog networks
Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
StaticGreedy: solving the scalability-accuracy dilemma in influence maximization
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Conference on information & knowledge management
Personalized influence maximization on social networks
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Conference on information & knowledge management
A probability based algorithm for influence maximization in social networks
Proceedings of the 5th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Kempe et al. [4] (KKT) showed the problem of influence maximization is NP-hard and a simple greedy algorithm guarantees the best possible approximation factor in PTIME. However, it has two major sources of inefficiency. First, finding the expected spread of a node set is #P-hard. Second, the basic greedy algorithm is quadratic in the number of nodes. The first source is tackled by estimating the spread using Monte Carlo simulation or by using heuristics[4, 6, 2, 5, 1, 3]. Leskovec et al. proposed the CELF algorithm for tackling the second. In this work, we propose CELF++ and empirically show that it is 35-55% faster than CELF.