Detection of 3D spinal geometry using iterated marginal space learning

  • Authors:
  • B. Michael Kelm;S. Kevin Zhou;Michael Suehling;Yefeng Zheng;Michael Wels;Dorin Comaniciu

  • Affiliations:
  • Corporate Technology, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany;Siemens Corporate Research, Princeton;Siemens Corporate Research, Princeton;Siemens Corporate Research, Princeton;Siemens Corporate Research, Princeton;Siemens Corporate Research, Princeton

  • Venue:
  • MCV'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international MICCAI conference on Medical computer vision: recognition techniques and applications in medical imaging
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Determining spinal geometry and in particular the position and orientation of the intervertebral disks is an integral part of nearly every spinal examination with Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging. It is particularly important for the standardized alignment of the scan geometry with the spine. In this paper, we present a novel method that combines Marginal Space Learning (MSL), a recently introduced concept for efficient discriminative object detection, with a generative anatomical network that incorporates relative pose information for the detection of multiple objects. It is used to simultaneously detect and label the intervertebral disks in a given spinal image volume. While a novel iterative version of MSL is used to quickly generate candidate detections comprising position, orientation, and scale of the disks with high sensitivity, the anatomical network selects the most likely candidates using a learned prior on the individual nine dimensional transformation spaces. Since the proposed approach is learning-based it can be trained for MR or CT alike. Experimental results based on 42 MR volumes show that our system not only achieves superior accuracy but also is the fastest system of its kind in the literature - on average, the spinal disks of a whole spine are detected in 11.5s with 98.6% sensitivity and 0.073 false positive detections per volume. An average position error of 2.4mm and angular error of 3.9° is achieved.