Machine Learning
Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Choosing Multiple Parameters for Support Vector Machines
Machine Learning
Performance Evaluation of Some Clustering Algorithms and Validity Indices
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference (Bradford Books)
Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radialbasis function classifiers
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Hand grip pattern recognition for mobile user interfaces
IAAI'06 Proceedings of the 18th conference on Innovative applications of artificial intelligence - Volume 2
Margin and domain integrated classification
ICIP'09 Proceedings of the 16th IEEE international conference on Image processing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Support vector machines (SVMs) have been successfully used in many classification fields. However, conventional SVMs do not consider rejecting inputs and thus suffer from false alarms. The first reason for this is that every input is assumed to belong to one of the object classes and is accepted in some class. In this paper, we will show that the second reason is that conventional SVMs do not describe each object class well. Thus, use of an output threshold does not solve this problem. We present a new support vector representation and discrimination machine (SVRDM), which has a discrimination capability comparable to that of the conventional SVM, and also offers good rejection ability. False alarm rates are greatly reduced. We analyze the properties of these two classifiers (SVM and SVRDM) in transformed feature space and compare their performances using both synthetic and real data.