DIBCO 2009: document image binarization contest

Authors:
B. Gatos;K. Ntirogiannis;I. Pratikakis
Affiliations:
National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Computational Intelligence Laboratory, Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications, 153 10, Agia Paraskevi, Athens, Greece;National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Computational Intelligence Laboratory, Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications, 153 10, Agia Paraskevi, Athens, Greece;National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Computational Intelligence Laboratory, Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications, 153 10, Agia Paraskevi, Athens, Greece
Venue:
International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition - Special Issue on Performance Evaluation
Year:
2011

Citing 0
Cited 7

Adaptive thresholding methods for documents image binarization

MCPR'11 Proceedings of the Third Mexican conference on Pattern recognition
An adaptive local binarization method for document images based on a novel thresholding method and dynamic windows

Pattern Recognition Letters
AdOtsu: An adaptive and parameterless generalization of Otsu's method for document image binarization

Pattern Recognition
A learning framework for the optimization and automation of document binarization methods

Computer Vision and Image Understanding
An optimization for binarization methods by removing binary artifacts

Pattern Recognition Letters
F-measure as the error function to train neural networks

IWANN'13 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Artificial Neural Networks: advances in computational intelligence - Volume Part I
A combined approach for the binarization of handwritten document images

Pattern Recognition Letters

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

DIBCO 2009 is the first International Document Image Binarization Contest organized in the context of ICDAR 2009 conference. The general objective of the contest is to identify current advances in document image binarization using established evaluation performance measures. This paper describes the contest details including the evaluation measures used as well as the performance of the 43 submitted methods along with a short description of the top five algorithms.