An evaluation of state-of-the-art approaches for web service selection

Authors:
Mojtaba Khezrian;Wan M. N. Wan Kadir;Suhaimi Ibrahim;Keyvan Mohebbi;Kanmani Munusamy;Sayed Gholam Hassan Tabatabaei
Affiliations:
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM);Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM);Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM);Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM);Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM);Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)
Venue:
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
Year:
2010

Citing 4
Cited 0

A Framework and Ontology for Dynamic Web Services Selection

IEEE Internet Computing
IRS-III: A broker-based approach to semantic Web services

Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web
Implementing Semantic Web Services: The SESA Framework

Implementing Semantic Web Services: The SESA Framework
Web Service Selection Based on Analytical Network Process Approach

APSCC '08 Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Nowadays, considering Web Services has become one of the hot issues in the area of computer science that makes an ability to collect capabilities and components in a unique interface to fulfill the user's requirements. Sometimes two or more services are discovered in available list of services; therefore, there should be a possibility for selecting the best services from discovered list which can satisfy the user's goal. Currently, there are some approaches for sustaining Semantic Web Service Selection such as WSMO, OWL-S, and SAWSDL. In this paper a classification based on two levels is presented: QoS level and Semantic level. The QoS level includes five categories: Policy based, Trust & Reputation based, Improve protocol based, Semantic based, and Preference based. The Semantic level includes: WSMO, OWL-S, and SAWSDL. In each level, the approaches are compared based on some criteria such as Performance, Automatic, and Scalability. Finally the results of the comparative evaluation are presented in both levels.