Congestion avoidance and control
SIGCOMM '88 Symposium proceedings on Communications architectures and protocols
A control-theoretic approach to flow control
SIGCOMM '91 Proceedings of the conference on Communications architecture & protocols
End-to-end packet delay and loss behavior in the internet
SIGCOMM '93 Conference proceedings on Communications architectures, protocols and applications
Measuring Bottleneck Link Speed in Packet-Switched Networks
Measuring Bottleneck Link Speed in Packet-Switched Networks
End-to-end available bandwidth: measurement methodology, dynamics, and relation with TCP throughput
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
Packet-dispersion techniques and a capacity-estimation methodology
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
Nettimer: a tool for measuring bottleneck link, bandwidth
USITS'01 Proceedings of the 3rd conference on USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems - Volume 3
SPAND: shared passive network performance discovery
USITS'97 Proceedings of the USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems on USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems
Evaluation and characterization of available bandwidth probing techniques
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Bandwidth estimation: metrics, measurement techniques, and tools
IEEE Network: The Magazine of Global Internetworking
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Bottleneck link capacity tools or methods can be used according to different application requirements. Some applications require not only measurement accuracy but also very short sampling time and high sampling frequency. In the paper, first, we decribe the principles of some concepts according to the literatures. Next we introduce the techniques of PPTD. At last, we choose the three tools that are using the techniques of PPTD for compare and analysis. These tools are all used to measure bottleneck link capacity. We made experimental simulations to analyze tools from four aspects which are measurement accuracy, total probe traffic generated, total estimation time and stability. From the experiments, we find the Nettimer is the most accurate but with low probe bandwidth and short estimation time. The results also indicate that which tool is the best in different applications.