Communications of the ACM
Information Visualization: Perception for Design
Information Visualization: Perception for Design
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Do security toolbars actually prevent phishing attacks?
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0
SSYM'99 Proceedings of the 8th conference on USENIX Security Symposium - Volume 8
You've been warned: an empirical study of the effectiveness of web browser phishing warnings
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Teaching Johnny not to fall for phish
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT)
Crying wolf: an empirical study of SSL warning effectiveness
SSYM'09 Proceedings of the 18th conference on USENIX security symposium
On the design of a "moody" keyboard
Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
A usability test of whitelist and blacklist-based anti-phishing application
Proceeding of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference
Hi-index | 0.01 |
Internet users are targets for ever-advancing phishing- and other attacks. The risks are, for example, to disclose credit card information or passwords to unauthorized instances. One approach to help users with insecure situations is provided by MoodyBoard, which uses ambient information to highlight potential risks. In this paper, we present findings from an evaluation of this system. Two user studies were conducted in order to find out whether an ambient security tool can protect users during sensitive tasks. We designed a pilot study to find out whether users understand the warnings and a security study to see if it helps to protect users from phishing attacks. Results show that MoodyBoard users behaved significantly more secure.