Readings in information retrieval
mSpace: improving information access to multimedia domains with multimodal exploratory search
Communications of the ACM - Supporting exploratory search
Touchstone: exploratory design of experiments
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Effects of structure and interaction style on distinct search tasks
Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
Making software verification tools really work
ATVA'11 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Automated technology for verification and analysis
RepliCHI SIG: from a panel to a new submission venue for replication
CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Direct manipulation and the third dimension: co-planar dragging on 3d displays
Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces
CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Can plans and situated actions be replicated?
Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The replication of research findings is a cornerstone of good science. Replication confirms results, strengthens research, and makes sure progress is based on solid foundations. CHI, however, rewards novelty and is focused on new results. As a community, therefore, we do not value, facilitate, or reward replication in research, and often take the significant results of a single user study on 20 users to be true. This panel will address the issues surrounding replication in our community, and discuss: a) how much of our broad diverse discipline is 'science', b) how, if at all, we currently see replication of research in our community, c) whether we should place more emphasis on replication in some form, and d) how that should look in our community. The aim of the panel is to make a proposal to future CHI organizers (2 are on the panel) for how we should facilitate replication in the future.