Towards the improvement of use case models: the AIRDoc process

Authors:
Ricardo Ramos;Jaelson Castro;João Araújo;Fernanda Alencar
Affiliations:
Universidade Federal do, Vale do São Francisco (UNIVASF), Juazeiro, BA - Brazil;Universidade Federal de, Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE - Brazil;Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Caparica, Lisboa - Portugall;Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE - Brazil
Venue:
Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
Year:
2011

Citing 6
Cited 0

Goal-directed requirements acquisition

6IWSSD Selected Papers of the Sixth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design
Writing Effective Use Cases

Writing Effective Use Cases
Use Case Pitfalls: Top 10 Problems from Real Projects Using Use Cases

TOOLS '99 Proceedings of the Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems
Modelling strategic relationships for process reengineering

Modelling strategic relationships for process reengineering
Use Cases: Patterns and Modeling Problems

Use Cases: Patterns and Modeling Problems
Refactoring Use Case Models on Episodes

Proceedings of the 19th IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

A requirements document tends to be full of requirements that are no longer meaningful, descriptions that are unnecessarily long-winded and complicated, and duplicated information, among other shortcomings. These problems hinder the overall understandability of the requirements document and might compromise the subsequent development phases. A requirements document quality evaluation strategy should incorporate also guidelines to help practitioners to effectively measure and improve their requirements documents. In this poster paper we brief describe a process that supports the evaluation and improvement of use case models named AIRDoc.