Comparison of simultaneous and sequential two-view registration for 3D/2D registration of vascular images

Authors:
Chetna Pathak;Mark Van Horn;Susan Weeks;Elizabeth Bullitt
Affiliations:
Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC;Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC;Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC;Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
Venue:
MICCAI'05 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention - Volume Part II
Year:
2005

Citing 5
Cited 0

Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint

Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint
Matching 3D MR angiography data and 2D X-ray angiograms

CVRMed-MRCAS '97 Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medial Robotics and Computer-Assisted Surgery
Real-Time Registration of 3D Cerebral Vessels to X-ray Angiograms

MICCAI '98 Proceedings of the First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention
3D/2D Registration via Skeletal Near Projective Invariance in Tubular Objects

MICCAI '98 Proceedings of the First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention
A Quick 3D-2D Registration Method for a Wide-Range of Applications

ICPR '00 Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition - Volume 1

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Accurate 3D/2D vessel registration is complicated by issues of image quality, occlusion, and other problems. This study performs a quantitative comparison of 3D/2D vessel registration in which vessels segmented from preoperative CT or MR are registered with biplane x-ray angiograms by either a) simultaneous two-view registration with advance calculation of the relative pose of the two views, or b) sequential registration with each view. We conclude on the basis of phantom studies that, even in the absence of image errors, simultaneous two-view registration is more accurate than sequential registration. In more complex settings, including clinical conditions, the relative accuracy of simultaneous two-view registration is even greater.