A trainable document summarizer
SIGIR '95 Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews
WWW '03 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web
Movie Review Mining: a Comparison between Supervised and Unsupervised Classification Approaches
HICSS '05 Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'05) - Track 4 - Volume 04
Thumbs up or thumbs down?: semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews
ACL '02 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions
EMNLP '03 Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing
Determining the sentiment of opinions
COLING '04 Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval
Mining opinion features in customer reviews
AAAI'04 Proceedings of the 19th national conference on Artifical intelligence
Just how mad are you? finding strong and weak opinion clauses
AAAI'04 Proceedings of the 19th national conference on Artifical intelligence
Exploiting subjectivity classification to improve information extraction
AAAI'05 Proceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 3
LexRank: graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Opinion Mining on Newspaper Quotations
WI-IAT '09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 03
Toward opinion summarization: linking the sources
SST '06 Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text
Summarizing threads in blogs using opinion polarity
eETTs '09 Proceedings of the Workshop on Events in Emerging Text Types
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper we address the question of whether "very positive" or "very negative" sentences from the perspective of sentiment analysis are "good" summary sentences from the perspective of text summarisation. We operationalise the concepts of very positive and very negative sentences by using the output of a sentiment analyser and evaluate how good a sentence is for summarisation by making use of standard text summarisation metrics and a corpus annotated for both salience and sentiment. In addition, we design and execute a statistical test to evaluate the aforementioned hypothesis. We conclude that the hypothesis does not hold, at least not based on our corpus data, and argue that summarising sentiment and summarising text are two different tasks which should be treated separately.