Global sensitivity analysis in welding simulations-What are the material data you really need?

  • Authors:
  • Olivier Asserin;Alexandre Loredo;Matthieu Petelet;Bertrand Iooss

  • Affiliations:
  • CEA, DEN, DM2S, SEMT, LTA, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France;LRMA, EA 1859, Université de Bourgogne, France;CEA, DEN, DM2S, SEMT, LTA, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France and LRMA, EA 1859, Université de Bourgogne, France;EDF R&D, 6 Quai Watier, 78401 Chatou, France

  • Venue:
  • Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper, the sensitivity analysis methodology is applied to numerical welding simulation in order to rank the importance of input variables on the outputs of the code like distorsions or residual stresses. The numerical welding simulation uses the finite element method, with a thermal computation followed by a mechanical one. Classically, a local sensitivity analysis is performed, hence the validity of the results is limited to the neighbourhood of a nominal point, and cross effects cannot be detected. This study implements a global sensitivity analysis which allows to screen the whole material space of the steel family mechanical properties. A set of inputs of the mechanical model-material properties that are temperature-dependent-is generated with the help of latin hypercube sampling. The same welding simulation is performed with each sampling element as input data. Then, output statistical processing allows us to classify the relative input influences by means of different sensitivity indices estimates. Two different welding configurations are studied. Considering their major differences, they give a different ranking of inputs, but both of them show that only a few parameters are responsible for the variability of the outputs. To illustrate the pertinence of the overall process, for the first of the two configurations, two series of computations are performed: one for a complete sample and one for its reduced version-where all the secondary parameters are set to mean values. They match perfectly, showing a substantial economy can be done by giving mean values to the rest of the inputs. Sensitivity analysis has then provided answers to what we consider one of the probable frequently asked questions regarding welding simulation: for a given welding configuration, which properties must be measured with a good accuracy and which ones can be simply extrapolated or taken from a similar material? That leads us to propose a comprehensive methodology for welding simulations including four sequential steps: a problem characterization, a sensitivity analysis, an experimental campaign, simulations.