Analysis of TCP performance over mobile ad hoc networks
MobiCom '99 Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Capacity of Ad Hoc wireless networks
Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
A comparison of TCP performance over three routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks
MobiHoc '01 Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing
Congestion control for high bandwidth-delay product networks
Proceedings of the 2002 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
TCP Performance in Wireless Multi-hop Networks
WMCSA '99 Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computer Systems and Applications
How Bad TCP Can Perform In Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
ISCC '02 Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC'02)
How well can the IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN support quality of service?
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
ATCP: TCP for mobile ad hoc networks
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This is a preliminary step towards a systematic approach to jointly design TCP congestion control algorithms and MAC algorithms, TCP tends to overshoot the network capacity and its granularity of sending rate adjustment is too coarse because the minimum increase in window size is the size of one packet upon each TCP acknowledgment or during each round trip time. A new wireless congestion control protocol is defined based on the channel busyness ratio. In this protocol, each forwarding node determines the inter-node and intra-node fair channel resource allocation and allocates the resource to the passing flows by monitoring and possibly overwriting the feedback field of the data packets according to its measured channel busyness ratio. Clearly, the sending rate of each flow is determined by the channel utilisation status at the bottleneck node. Through NS2 simulations, we conclude that channel utilisation, delay and fairness are better for WCCP than the traditional TCP.