Neutralizing linguistically problematic annotations in unsupervised dependency parsing evaluation

  • Authors:
  • Roy Schwartz;Omri Abend;Roi Reichart;Ari Rappoport

  • Affiliations:
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem;Hebrew University of Jerusalem;Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology;Hebrew University of Jerusalem

  • Venue:
  • HLT '11 Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Volume 1
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Dependency parsing is a central NLP task. In this paper we show that the common evaluation for unsupervised dependency parsing is highly sensitive to problematic annotations. We show that for three leading unsupervised parsers (Klein and Manning, 2004; Cohen and Smith, 2009; Spitkovsky et al., 2010a), a small set of parameters can be found whose modification yields a significant improvement in standard evaluation measures. These parameters correspond to local cases where no linguistic consensus exists as to the proper gold annotation. Therefore, the standard evaluation does not provide a true indication of algorithm quality. We present a new measure, Neutral Edge Direction (NED), and show that it greatly reduces this undesired phenomenon.