Analyzing the structure of argumentative discourse
Computational Linguistics
Conceptual retrieval and case law
ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Representation of legal text for conceptual retrieval
ICAIL '91 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
A conceptual, case-relation representation of text for intelligent retrieval
A conceptual, case-relation representation of text for intelligent retrieval
Automatic detection of causal relations for Question Answering
MultiSumQA '03 Proceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on Multilingual summarization and question answering - Volume 12
Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Inferences, suppositions and explanatory extensions in argument interpretation
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Automatic Argumentation Detection and its Role in Law and the Semantic Web
Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web: Channelling the Legal Information Flood
Study on the Structure of Argumentation in Case Law
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference
Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
The WEKA data mining software: an update
ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
Identifying high-level organizational elements in argumentative discourse
NAACL HLT '12 Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
Using Argumentation Schemes for Argument Extraction: A Bottom-Up Method
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence
Using Argumentation Schemes for Argument Extraction: A Bottom-Up Method
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Argumentation schemes are structures or templates for various kinds of arguments. Given the text of an argument with premises and conclusion identified, we classify it as an instance of one of five common schemes, using features specific to each scheme. We achieve accuracies of 63--91% in one-against-others classification and 80--94% in pairwise classification (baseline = 50% in both cases).