Definition and analysis of intermediate entailment levels
EMSEE '05 Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment
On the role of lexical and world knowledge in RTE3
RTE '07 Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing
Shallow semantics in fast textual entailment rule learners
RTE '07 Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing
Building an annotated textual inference corpus for motion and space
TextInfer '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Applied Textual Inference
Using hypernymy acquisition to tackle (part of) textual entailment
TextInfer '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Applied Textual Inference
"Ask not what textual entailment can do for you..."
ACL '10 Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Toward qualitative evaluation of textual entailment systems
COLING '10 Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In the Textual Entailment community, a shared effort towards a deeper understanding of the core phenomena involved in textual inference is recently arose. To analyse how the common intuition that decomposing TE would allow a better comprehension of the problem from both a linguistic and a computational viewpoint, we propose a definition for strong component-based TE, where each component is in itself a complete TE system, able to address a TE task on a specific phenomenon in isolation. We review the literature according to our definition, trying to position relevant work as more or less close to our idea of strong component-based TE. Several dimensions of the problem are discussed: i) the implementation of system components to address specific inference types, ii) the analysis of the phenomena relevant to component-based TE, and iii) the development of evaluation methodologies to assess TE systems capabilities to address single phenomena in a pair.