Research profiling for `standardization and innovation'

Authors:
Dong Geun Choi;Heesang Lee;Tae-Kyung Sung
Affiliations:
Standards and Quality Division, Korean Standards Association, Gangnam-Gu, Korea 135-513;Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea 440-746;School of Management, Jeonju University, Hyoja-Dong, Korea 560-759
Venue:
Scientometrics
Year:
2011

Citing 7
Cited 1

A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation

Journal of Information Science
Inter-consortia battles in mobile payments standardisation

Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Standards-Based Computing Capabilities for Distributed Geospatial Applications

Computer
Developing health information systems in developing countries: the flexible standards strategy

MIS Quarterly
Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: the case of the U.S. residential mortgage industry

MIS Quarterly
Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: network effects, switching costs, and path dependency

MIS Quarterly
An innovative, high quality and search window independent motion estimation algorithm and architecture for MPEG-2 encoding

IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics

The Evolution of IETF Standards and their Production

International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper addresses the profiling of research papers on `standardization and innovation'--exploring major topics and arguments in this field. Drawing on 528 papers retrieved from the database, Web of Science, we employed trend, factor, and clustering analyses to demonstrate that the standardization and innovation research has continuously grown from publication of 13 papers in 1995 to 68 papers in 2008; the majority of these papers have been published in the six subject group domains of management, economics, environment, chemistry, computer science, and telecommunications. Technology innovation management specialty journals are the most central sources favorable for these themes. We also present an exploratory taxonomy that offers nine topical clusters to demonstrate the contextual structures of standardization and innovation. The implications of our results for ongoing consistent policy and future research into standardization and innovation are discussed.