The effect of informal social support: Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication

  • Authors:

  • Joshua Lewandowski;Benjamin D. Rosenberg;M. Jordan Parks;Jason T. Siegel

  • Affiliations:

  • Claremont Graduate University, 150 E. 10th Street, Claremont, CA 91711, USA;Claremont Graduate University, 150 E. 10th Street, Claremont, CA 91711, USA;Claremont Graduate University, 150 E. 10th Street, Claremont, CA 91711, USA;Claremont Graduate University, 150 E. 10th Street, Claremont, CA 91711, USA

  • Venue:
  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Survey data were collected on a military sample to test two main hypotheses about the impact of face-to-face and computer-mediated social support following disruptive life events. We tested two main hypotheses: first, as previous research indicates, the impact of a disruptive life event is partially dependent upon the amount of social support one receives during the time of the event (H1). Second, the type of communication used will further impact the effectiveness of social support in comforting individuals following a negative life event. Results support both hypotheses, indicating that the buffering role of social support following a disruptive life event is not only dependent upon the amount of social support one receives, but is further affected by the type of communication that participants used to receive support. These findings provide support for the buffering hypothesis' utility in the realm of computer-mediated communication, as well as the application of the cues-filtered-out approach in the mediated social support domain.