Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection
Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection
Foundations of genetic programming
Foundations of genetic programming
Fitness Distance Correlation as a Measure of Problem Difficulty for Genetic Algorithms
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms
Proceedings of the European Conference on Genetic Programming
PPSN III Proceedings of the International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. The Third Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
General schema theory for genetic programming with subtree-swapping crossover: Part II
Evolutionary Computation
GECCO '05 Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
A Study of Fitness Distance Correlation as a Difficulty Measure in Genetic Programming
Evolutionary Computation
Automatic Creation of Taxonomies of Genetic Programming Systems
EuroGP '09 Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Genetic Programming
Practical model of genetic programming's performance on rational symbolic regression problems
EuroGP'08 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Genetic programming
A Field Guide to Genetic Programming
A Field Guide to Genetic Programming
Practical performance models of algorithms in evolutionary program induction and other domains
Artificial Intelligence
Performance prediction and automated tuning of randomized and parametric algorithms
CP'06 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Proceedings of the 14th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Most theoretical models of evolutionary algorithms are difficult to apply to realistic situations. In this paper, two models of evolutionary program-induction algorithms (EPAs) are proposed which overcome this limitation. We test our approach with two important classes of problems -- symbolic regression and Boolean function induction -- and a variety of EPAs including: different versions of genetic programming, gene expression programing, stochastic iterated hill climbing in program space and one version of cartesian genetic programming. We compare the proposed models against a practical model of EPAs we previously developed and find that in most cases the new models are simpler and produce better predictions. A great deal can also be learnt about an EPA via a simple inspection of our new models. E.g., it is possible to infer which characteristics make a problem difficult or easy for the EPA.