Differentiating between successful and less successful products by using MAInEEAC - a model for interaction characterization

Authors:
Steffen Hess;Andreas Maier;Marcus Trapp
Affiliations:
Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany;Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany;Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany
Venue:
HCII'11 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction: design and development approaches - Volume Part I
Year:
2011

Citing 7
Cited 1

A “call for answers” around the proposition of an HCI-enriched model

ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
A generalization of the GOURD model of human-computer interaction

ACM-SE 37 Proceedings of the 37th annual Southeast regional conference (CD-ROM)
Object-action association: a HCI design model

Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
A method and advisor tool for multimedia user interface design

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Universal accessibility as a multimodal design issue

Communications of the ACM - ACM at sixty: a look back in time
ON MODELING: What is interaction?: are there different types?

interactions
Computational modeling approaches help guide early design efforts for usability

The Fifth Richard Tapia Celebration of Diversity in Computing Conference: Intellect, Initiatives, Insight, and Innovations

User interaction forensics: detecting and interpreting the user's footprints during touch interaction

DUXU'13 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Design, User Experience, and Usability: design philosophy, methods, and tools - Volume Part I

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Today, the success of a software product is defined by a great user experience caused by a well-defined interaction concept rather than features. Therefore we present a new interaction model called MAInEEAC (Model for Accurate Interaction Engineering, Enhancement, Alteration, and Characterization) that is able to show what makes an interaction a great experience and what are the elements of great human-computer-interaction. Having evaluated the ways of entering an address with nine distinct navigation systems, we present several findings which are crucial for making an interaction successful. Thereby it becomes clear that a higher level of detail is required in order to recognize important differences between single interactions. MAInEEAC provides these details and can be seen as a further step towards better understanding of human-computer-interaction.