On variants of file caching

  • Authors:

  • Leah Epstein;Csanád Imreh;Asaf Levin;Judit Nagy-György

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Mathematics, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel;Department of Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary;Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, The Technion, Haifa, Israel;Department of Mathematics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary

  • Venue:
  • ICALP'11 Proceedings of the 38th international colloquim conference on Automata, languages and programming - Volume Part I
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In the file caching problem, the input is a sequence of requests for files out of a slow memory. A file has two attributes, a retrieval cost and an integer size. It is required to maintain a cache of size k, bringing each file, which is not present in the cache at the time of request, from the slow memory into the cache. This incurs a cost equal to the retrieval cost of the file. Well-known special cases include paging (all costs and sizes are equal to 1), the cost model which is also known as weighted paging (all sizes are equal to 1), the fault model (all costs are equal to 1) and the bit model (the cost of a file is equal to its size). We study two online variants of the problem, caching with bypassing and caching with rejection. If bypassing is allowed, a miss for a file still results in an access to this file in the slow memory, but its subsequent insertion into the cache is optional. In the model with rejection, together with each request for a file, the algorithm is informed with a rejection penalty of the request. When a file which is not present in the cache is requested, the algorithm must either bring the file into the cache, paying the retrieval cost of the file, or reject the file, paying the rejection penalty of the request. The goal function is the sum of total rejection penalty and the total retrieval cost. We design deterministic and randomized algorithms for both problems. The competitive ratios of these randomized algorithms match the best known results for caching. In the deterministic case, it is known that a (k + 1)-competitive algorithm for caching with bypassing exists, and this is best possible. In contrast, we present a lower bound of 2k+1 on the competitive ratio of any deterministic algorithm for the variant with rejection, which holds already for paging. We design a (2k+2)-competitive algorithm for caching with rejection, and a different (2k+1)-competitive algorithm, which is applicable for paging, the bit model and the cost model.