Improved Approximation Algorithms for Shop Scheduling Problems
SIAM Journal on Computing
STOC '00 Proceedings of the thirty-second annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Some APX-completeness results for cubic graphs
Theoretical Computer Science
Better Approximation Guarantees for Job-Shop Scheduling
SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics
Makespan Minimization in Job Shops: A Linear Time Approximation Scheme
SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics
Non-Approximability Results for Scheduling Problems with Minsum Criteria
INFORMS Journal on Computing
Improved Inapproximability Results for MaxClique, Chromatic Number and Approximate Graph Coloring
FOCS '01 Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Job Shop Scheduling with Unit Processing Times
Mathematics of Operations Research
Tight bounds for permutation flow shop scheduling
IPCO'08 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Integer programming and combinatorial optimization
An algorithmic approach to the lovász local lemma. I
Random Structures & Algorithms
A simpler proof for O(congestion+dilation) packet routing
IPCO'13 Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization
On the weak computability of a four dimensional orthogonal packing and time scheduling problem
Theoretical Computer Science
Hi-index | 0.01 |
We consider several variants of the job shop problem that is a fundamental and classical problem in scheduling. The currently best approximation algorithms have worse than logarithmic performance guarantee, but the only previously known inapproximability result says that it is NP-hard to approximate job shops within a factor less than 5/4. Closing this big approximability gap is a well-known and long-standing open problem. This article closes many gaps in our understanding of the hardness of this problem and answers several open questions in the literature. It is shown the first nonconstant inapproximability result that almost matches the best-known approximation algorithm for acyclic job shops. The same bounds hold for the general version of flow shops, where jobs are not required to be processed on each machine. Similar inapproximability results are obtained when the objective is to minimize the sum of completion times. It is also shown that the problem with two machines and the preemptive variant with three machines have no PTAS.