An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning
AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning
AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Defeasible reasoning and partial order planning
FoIKS'08 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Foundations of information and knowledge systems
Agreeing on plans through iterated disputes
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
An architecture for defeasible-reasoning-based cooperative distributed planning
OTM'11 Proceedings of the 2011th Confederated international conference on On the move to meaningful internet systems - Volume Part I
| Hi-index | 0.01 |
The term Multi-Agent Planning (MAP) refers to any kind of planning in domains in which several independent entities (agents) plan and act together. Recently, a number of attempts have used argumentation to handle the issue of selecting the best actions for an agent to do in a given situation [4]. Particularly, there have been proposals to apply argumentation theory to planning, for dealing with conflicting plans or goals. Most notably, the work in [3] represents a step ahead towards the resolution of a planning problem through argumentation by modeling a planner agent able to reason defeasibly. None of these works, however, apply to a multi-agent scenario except the work in [2] which presents an argumentation-based approach for cooperative agents who discuss plan proposals.