Characteristics of research in China assessed with Essential Science Indicators

  • Authors:

  • Hui-Zhen Fu;Kun-Yang Chuang;Ming-Huang Wang;Yuh-Shan Ho

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Environmental Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China 100871;Department of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan 11014;Department of Environmental Sciences, The Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China 100871;Department of Environmental Sciences, The Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China 100871 and Trend Research Cen ...

  • Venue:
  • Scientometrics
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

To provide an overview of the characteristics of research in China, a bibliometric evaluation of highly cited papers with high-level representation was conducted during the period from 1999 to 2009 based on the Essential Science Indicators (ESI) database. A comprehensive assessment covered overall performance, journals, subject categories, internationally collaborative countries, national inter-institutionally collaborative institutions, and most-cited papers in 22 scientific fields. China saw a strong growth in scientific publications in the last decade, to some extent due to increasing research and development expenditure. China has been more active in ESI fields of chemistry and physics, but more excellent in materials science, engineering and mathematics. Most publications were concerned with the common Science Citation Index subject categories of multidisciplinary chemistry, multidisciplinary materials and science, and physical chemistry. About one half China's ESC papers were internationally collaborative and the eight major industrialized countries (the USA, Germany, the UK, Japan, France, Canada, Russia, and Italy) played a prominent role in scientific collaboration with China, especially the USA. The Chinese Academy of Sciences took the leading position of institutions with many branches. The "985 Project" stimulated the most productive institutions for academic research with a huge funding injection and the universities in Hong Kong showed good scientific performance. The citation impact of internationally collaborative papers differed among fields and international collaborations made positive contributions to academic research in China.