Comparative study on fusion strategies for biometric handwriting

  • Authors:
  • Tobias Scheidat;Claus Vielhauer;Robert Fischer

  • Affiliations:
  • Brandenburg University of Applied Science, Brandenburg, Germany;Brandenburg University of Applied Science, Brandenburg, Germany;Brandenburg University of Applied Science, Brandenburg, Germany

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM multimedia workshop on Multimedia and security
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Nowadays, multi-biometric fusion is a recent topic in biometric signal processing. The main goal is to optimize the authentication performance by combining different biometric components, e.g. modalities or algorithms. In this paper we only focus on fusion methods for online handwriting biometrics and compare three different fusion approaches. The methodologies are based on the combination of two dfferent handwriting verification algorithms, two different representations of the same semantic or two different semantics contents, whereby in context of biometric handwriting, semantics are alternative written contents. The evaluation of the three fusion approaches is carried out on a uniform test set based on dynamic handwriting data acquired from 84 users. The results show, that any of the three strategies leads to improvements with respect to the verification performance measure used (equal error rate, EER). In the best cases the relative improvement increases from 17% to 36% for single-semantic fusion and from 57% to 66% for multi-semantic fusion.