Job shop scheduling by simulated annealing
Operations Research
Experimental Evaluation of Heuristic Optimization Algorithms: A Tutorial
Journal of Heuristics
Resource constrained scheduling on multiple machines
Information Processing Letters
Simulated annealing heuristic for flow shop scheduling problems with unrelated parallel machines
Computers and Operations Research
Computers and Operations Research
Computers and Operations Research
Computers and Operations Research
Note: Minimizing makespan with release times on identical parallel batching machines
Discrete Applied Mathematics
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
A GRASP approach for makespan minimization on parallel batch processing machines
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Capacitated location-routing problem with time windows under uncertainty
Knowledge-Based Systems
A simulated annealing heuristic for minimizing makespan in parallel machine scheduling
SEMCCO'12 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Swarm, Evolutionary, and Memetic Computing
Scheduling unrelated parallel batch processing machines with non-identical job sizes
Computers and Operations Research
Hi-index | 12.05 |
A simulated annealing (SA) algorithm to minimize the makespan on a group of identical batch processing machines arranged in parallel is presented. We consider the case where each job has an arbitrary processing time, non-identical size, and non-zero ready time. Each machine can process simultaneously several jobs as a batch as long as the machine capacity is not exceeded. The batch processing time is equal to the largest processing time among those jobs in the batch. Similarly, the batch ready time is equal to the largest ready time among all the jobs in the batch. Random instances were used to compare the results of the SA approach against a lower bound, a mathematical model, and two heuristics published in the literature: the Modified Delay (MD) heuristic and a Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure (GRASP). Computational experiments showed that the SA approach is comparable to GRASP with respect to solution quality, and less computationally costly. Both SA and GRASP comfortably outperformed the MD heuristic.