Performance comparison of xBR-trees and R*-trees for single dataset spatial queries

  • Authors:
  • George Roumelis;Michael Vassilakopoulos;Antonio Corral

  • Affiliations:
  • Open University of Cyprus, Cyprus;Dept. of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Central Greece, Greece and Open University of Cyprus, Cyprus;Dept. of Languages and Computing, University of Almeria, Spain

  • Venue:
  • ADBIS'11 Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Advances in databases and information systems
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Processing of spatial queries has been studied extensively in the literature. In most cases, it is accomplished by indexing spatial data by an access method. For queries involving a single dataset, like the Point Location Query, the Window (Distance Range) Query, the (Constrained) K Nearest Neighbor Query, the R*-tree (a data-driven structure) is a very popular choice of such a method. In this paper, we compare the performance of the R*-tree for processing single dataset spatial queries to the performance of a disk based structure that belongs to the Quadtree family, the xBR-tree (a space-driven structure). We demonstrate performance results (I/O efficiency and execution time) of extensive experimentation that was based on real datasets, using these two index structures. The winner depends on several parameters and the results show that the xBR-tree is a promising alternative for these spatial operations.