Training algorithms for linear text classifiers
SIGIR '96 Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
A study of thresholding strategies for text categorization
Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
Machine learning in automated text categorization
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Classification with Reject Option in Text Categorisation Systems
ICIAP '03 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing
An efficient manual image annotation approach based on tagging and browsing
Workshop on multimedia information retrieval on The many faces of multimedia semantics
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST)
Ensemble of binary learners for reliable text categorization with a reject option
HAIS'12 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems - Volume Part I
Threshold optimisation for multi-label classifiers
Pattern Recognition
Multi-label classification with a reject option
Pattern Recognition
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We investigate the implementation of multi-label classification algorithms with a reject option, as a mean to reduce the time required to human annotators and to attain a higher classification accuracy on automatically classified samples than the one which can be obtained without a reject option. Based on a recently proposed model of manual annotation time, we identify two approaches to implement a reject option, related to the two main manual annotation methods: browsing and tagging. In this paper we focus on the approach suitable to tagging, which consists in withholding either all or none of the category assignments of a given sample. We develop classification reliability measures to decide whether rejecting or not a sample, aimed at maximising classification accuracy on non-rejected ones. We finally evaluate the trade-off between classification accuracy and rejection rate that can be attained by our method, on three benchmark data sets related to text categorisation and image annotation tasks.