Precision-oriented evaluation of recommender systems: an algorithmic comparison

  • Authors:
  • Alejandro Bellogin;Pablo Castells;Ivan Cantador

  • Affiliations:
  • Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain;Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain;Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

There is considerable methodological divergence in the way precision-oriented metrics are being applied in the Recommender Systems field, and as a consequence, the results reported in different studies are difficult to put in context and compare. We aim to identify the involved methodological design alternatives, and their effect on the resulting measurements, with a view to assessing their suitability, advantages, and potential shortcomings. We compare five experimental methodologies, broadly covering the variants reported in the literature. In our experiments with three state-of-the-art recommenders, four of the evaluation methodologies are consistent with each other and differ from error metrics, in terms of the comparative recommenders' performance measurements. The other procedure aligns with RMSE, but shows a heavy bias towards known relevant items, considerably overestimating performance.