gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion
CSCW '88 Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work
Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications
He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Cooperation and quality in wikipedia
Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis
Social Information Processing in News Aggregation
IEEE Internet Computing
Measuring article quality in wikipedia: models and evaluation
Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management
Information quality work organization in wikipedia
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Finding the right facts in the crowd: factoid question answering over social media
Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web
Analysis of social voting patterns on digg
Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks
A few bad votes too many?: towards robust ranking in social media
AIRWeb '08 Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Adversarial information retrieval on the web
Towards large scale argumentation support on the semantic web
AAAI'07 Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
SAM: Semantic Argumentation Based Model for Collaborative Knowledge Creation and Sharing System
ICCCI '09 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence. Semantic Web, Social Networks and Multiagent Systems
Measurement and analysis of an online content voting network: a case study of Digg
Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web
Analyzing Community Deliberation and Achieving Consensual Knowledge in SAM
International Journal of Organizational and Collective Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Although vote eases a Social Web for making decision, a final solution selected by vote is not always the best and might be a wrong answer. Its application without community deliberation obstructs the capability of individuals to share knowledge, create and edit contents, as well as emerge innovative ideas. Moreover, not all votes are reliable due to the increasing of vote spam phenomenon. Accordingly, the community knowledge in Social Webs confront with the reliability and quality issues. This paper, therefore, presents an empirical study of community deliberation in Social Webs by identifying its important components and social interactions in order to clarify the characteristic of an online community. By applying useful measures for analyzing the deliberation and achieving quality-assured consensual knowledge, the experimental results show that the proposed measures make a significant improvement in the accuracy of potential positions' discovery comparing to the traditional voting method.