Are performance differences of interest operators statistically significant?

  • Authors:
  • Nadia Kanwal;Shoaib Ehsan;Adrian F. Clark

  • Affiliations:
  • VASE Laboratory, Computer Science & Electronic Engineering University of Essex, Colchester, UK and Lahore College for Women University, Pakistan;VASE Laboratory, Computer Science & Electronic Engineering University of Essex, Colchester, UK;VASE Laboratory, Computer Science & Electronic Engineering University of Essex, Colchester, UK

  • Venue:
  • CAIP'11 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Computer analysis of images and patterns - Volume Part II
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The differences in performance of a range of interest operators are examined in a null hypothesis framework using McNemar's test on a widely-used database of images, to ascertain whether these apparent differences are statistically significant. It is found that some performance differences are indeed statistically significant, though most of them are at a fairly low level of confidence, i.e. with about a 1-in-20 chance that the results could be due to features of the evaluation database. A new evaluation measure i.e. accurate homography estimation is used to characterize the performance of feature extraction algorithms.Results suggest that operators employing longer descriptors are more reliable.